Going back to an old post...and something that was currently commented on, on here.
You made the post that this topic is about, I said "wow glad you pulled that off the top of your head"...
do you remember what your reply was? If not, read...you replied...."I did not pull that off the top of my head.... it was in my heart"
Yet it sure looks like it was here
http://www.gospelway.com/church/denominations.htm
This, and other things lately, are at least in my view (and maybe to a lesser extent Mik_Mo and others issue.
Discuss what you think, what you view, don't go to sites and get us bible lessons, everybody is capable of doing that (since to be posting here, they have to be on the internet and unless those sites are membership only, they have as much access to them as you do). If you want to post on a topic, then credit the site or link to the site and then mention what you think about it, not just cut/paste jobs.
Religious discussion should be that, discussion. If we wanted to put what someone else thinks, then thats fine and dandy, but acknowledge that.
The way you had written previous entries, I think I commented that you got the information off of a website ,and you at least tried to imply that nope, it was what you thought.
The fact that appears to not be the case, if nothing else, makes you appear very 'questionable' in your attempts.
I mean even on the sports forum, when someone comments about rumors or news, they either quote where they got it, if they quote things word for word, or discuss things in their own words.
What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it.
Yes I agree I did read that article some time ago.. yes so what is the big deal? It was on my heart.... that is what people do.. they read something it sticks with them then they talk about.... you and another person continually test my crediability.. that is okay.. why do you not post a lot on here? Anaylize me if you wish... no big deal.
Maybe Mikmo needs to stop reading my posts or at least stop whinning about them..... I do discuss what I think... when I copy and paste articles it is put there for a response... just because they have access to them doesnt mean that I need to stop posting them in my view... I do not see the problem in it. I have recently added the url address to the articles..... what if I just signed underneath them and say not my original work.. what that be okay? By me posting is aying that I agree with it and now I am looking for a response to the article. I NEVER ATTEMPTED TO IMPLY ANYTHING!! See there you go assuming.... that is not true. If you think what I post is questionable or that I am that is up to you... you have the freedom to read or not to read as everyone else does also. I will try to specify everything in the future.
Look, you're missing the point. I'm tired of trying to explain this to you, but I will try once more, because I am a patient person.
The purpose of this board is to discuss views, religious views. It is not a pulpit.
It is fine to discuss what you think on a subject, but you are not posting what you think about a subject, you are posting what someone else thinks.
This is the reason I was kind of smart before when I said glad you pulled that all off the top of your head, and you said it was in your heart.
No, maybe the subject was in your heart, but read the things and analyze them to yourself if thats the case. If someone asks on this board "Do you think this church is right or wrong", give YOUR opinion, NOT A WEBSITE'S OPINION. If you tend to agree, use your own words, not someone else's.
You are right about the freedom to read, but there is a purpose that this board was created. You have the ability to follow the rules that the board was created for or you have the ability to not be on here, its really that simple.
When people post on this board, they are wanting to know what others think or feel. Great, quote a scripture if its relevant, but give your opinion, not whomever posts the view or sermon on another website.
On a similar discussion earlier, you reading what Billy Bob posts doesn't mean you studied anything, it means you are reading what someone else thinks, believes. It is therefore subject to their own beliefs, views, studies. If you can't understand what the difference is, then sorry, maybe this board isn't for you. I am fairly sure that I do not stand alone in this, but if you disagree, you more than have the right to disagree, but we have the right to run the board(s) as we see fit, not as you see fit.
What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it.
By the way, your first quote, they read it and it sticks with them. Then by God, post on what sticks with you, not copy/paste. I dare say most of the people who read here and post here would have a lot more respect for what you say, what you post IF you posted what YOU think, not what a site tells you THEY think.
What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach, so you get what we had here last week which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks